International Journal of Clinical & Medical Imaging | OMICS International | Editorial Board
Home  |  Journals  |  Conferences |   Membership  |   FAQ's
Join  |  Contact  |   Sitemap  |                
OMICS Group Inc

International Journal of Clinical & Medical Images

ISSN: 2376-0249 Open Access

How did it Happen?

Other Art Works

Image 01 Image 02
Image 03 Image 04
Image 05 Image 06
Image 07 Image 08
Image 09 Image 10
Image 11 Image 12
Image 13 Image 14
Image 15 Image 16
Image 17 Image 18
Image 19 Image 20
Image 21 Image 22
Image 23 Image 24
Image 25 Image 26
Image 27 Image 28
Image 29 Image 30

A 22 year old female came with clinical picture of left sided ureteric colic. On investigation she was found to have a left sided ureteric stone and multiple bladder stones. Xray KUB confirmed the diagnosis (Figure 1a). She was admitted and was started on tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily while she was planned for intravenous urography. On day 2 of admission she passed 2 stones of size 13 mm and one stone of size 15 mm. Thereafter conservative treatment was continued and on day 5 she passed two stones of 15 mm and a stone of 22 mm (Figure 1b and 1c). X-ray KUB was repeated which showed no radio opaque shadow (Figure 1d). As per the guidelines of American Urology Association [1], patients with ureteral stones >10 mm could be observed or treated with MET, in most cases such stones will require surgical treatment. No recommendation can be made for spontaneous passage (with or without medical therapy) for patients with large stones. For stones more than 10 mm conservative management alone is insufficient [2]. Several studies have studied the effects of medical expulsive therapy but in stones not larger than 15 mm [3]. We are astonished by the results of conservative management in this case and want to know the view of your readers for the likely reason and whether to give medical therapy in all patients with larger stones before planning for any surgical intervention.